Pure tones are an abstraction-- all real-world sounds have bandwidth. Bells make nearly-pure narrow sounds; drums make wide ones. How do we measure interval ratios of notes with width?
We really need to know bandwidth relative to the note. For
example, the octave-sized interval {220hz, 440hz} has a width of 220hz,
but the octave {440hz, 880hz} takes up 440hz. They're both
octaves and should have the same "width", so we use the ratio r =
instead. An
octave
has
r = 3:2.
Each well-tempered note is
of an octave, so each reserves a band
with r =
18:1. Excepting
glissando, they don't normally use the whole width. We can
estimate how much they actually use:
For frequencies
and
, the interval ratio
is the slope of a
line. If the notes have width, the lines get fat:
|
|
|
The interval ratio could be the slope of any line going through the black box, for example, either of these:
The lowest denominator rule says the interval ratio is the most consonant possible ratio.
Here's a sanity test for the rule. A piano evokes interval
ratios even though the notes are well-tempered. The prediction is
that for some bandwidth, the well-tempered notes take the interval
ratios they're supposed to. In fact,
a frequency-to-bandwidth ratio of 100:1-- about
of the reserved
band-- does just that.
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_11.gif]](Images/index_gr_11.gif)
The diagram shows all possible integer ratios, with increasing
denominator on the y-axis. The target ratios are marked in
green.
If the bandwidth is too wide, the B flat becomes
; if too narrow,
we lose the E flat and the A:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_13.gif]](Images/index_gr_13.gif)
Using the lowest-denomionator rule, wide tones allow fewer distinct intervals. This is why you can't get harmony out of drums: wherever the center frequency is, there tends to be a consonance nearby. The interval ratio for frequencies near a ratio of 3:2 will sound like (by the rule) they are 3:2. A graph of possible denominators might look like this (y-axis is denominator, x-axis is frequency ratio):
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_14.gif]](Images/index_gr_14.gif)
So denominators even as high as 16 (a semitone) aren't possible at
this bandwidth.
Here is the graph for widths typical of a piano. The y-axis now
goes much higher:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_15.gif]](Images/index_gr_15.gif)
Extremely narrow bands makes many ratios available, but each consonance has a tiny catchment basin:
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_16.gif]](Images/index_gr_16.gif)
Historical note: in "On the Sensations of Tone," Helmholtz calculated
figure 60a to show the relative 'roughness' of arbitrary
intervals. 'Roughness' is his measure of the number of beats
produced by simultaneous tones; basically, dissonance. The
lowest-denominator rule seems to provide a closely related measurement.

Helmholtz: On the Sensations of Tone, page 193.
The idea of 'available ratios' is summarized in this
diagram. At the bottom are the wideband ratios; as you move
up the trunks, the bands thin and new harmonies become available as the
tones are purified. Black is consonance, white is
dissonance.
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_17.gif]](Images/index_gr_17.gif)
With wide bands, only consonance is possible-- like drum melodies, which roughly spell out a tune but can't create harmony. Higher on the y-axis, as the bands narrow, more intervals become possible.